Elastoplastic Soil Models
In this section:
The Modified Cam-Clay Soil Model
The Cam-Clay material model was developed in the 1970s at the University of Cambridge, and since then it has experienced different modifications. The modified Cam-Clay model is the most commonly used model due to its smooth yield surface, and it is the one implemented in the Geomechanics Module.
The modified Cam-Clay model is a so-called critical state model, where the loading and unloading of the material follows different trajectories in stress space. The model also features hardening and softening of clays. Different formulations can be found in textbooks about the model (see Ref. 13, Ref. 14, and Ref. 15).
The yield function is written in terms of the stress invariants
and
Following the Structural Mechanics Module sign convention (the pressure is positive in compression), the yield function reads:
This is an ellipse in p-q plane, with a cross section independent of the Lode angle. Note that p, q, and pc are positive variables.
The parameter M > 0 defines the slope of the critical state line in the p-q space. This parameter can be related to the angle of internal friction φ in the Mohr-Coulomb criterion as
Figure 3-14: Modified Cam-Clay ellipse in the pq-plane. The ellipse circumscribes a nonlinear elastic region.
In the modified Cam-Clay model, hardening is controlled by the consolidation pressure pc, which depends on the volumetric plastic strain εp,vol as
(3-40)
 
The volumetric plastic strain is available in the variable solid.epvol and the consolidation pressure in the variable item.pc.
The evolution of the consolidation pressure depends on the values for the reference void ratio eref, the swelling index κ, and the compression index λ, which are positive parameters that fulfill
and
The void ratio e is the ratio between pore volume and solid volume. It can be written in terms of the porosity φ as e = φ/(1−φ).
The compression index λ is the slope of the virgin isotropic consolidation line, and the swelling index κ is the slope of the rebound-reloading line (also called loading-reloading line) in the e versus ln(p) plane.
Figure 3-15: Slopes of the virgin isotropic consolidation line and rebound-reloading line in the e vs. ln(p) plane. The reference void ratio eref is measured at the reference pressure pref.
If an Initial Stress and Strain feature is added to the Cam-Clay material, the initial consolidation pressure pc0 must be made equal or bigger than one third of minus the trace of the initial stress tensor, otherwise the initial stress state is outside the Cam-Clay ellipse.
Volumetric elastic deformation
The stress-strain relation beyond the elastic range is of great importance in soil mechanics. For additive decomposition of strains, Cauchy’s stress tensor is written as
Here, σ is the stress tensor, ε is the total strain tensor, εinel is the inelastic strain tensor, σ0 is the initial or external stress tensor, and C is the fourth-order elasticity tensor. Assuming only elastic stresses in a linear isotropic elastic medium, Hooke’s law simplifies to
where K is the bulk modulus and G is the shear modulus. By using the convention that the pressure is the mean stress defined as positive in compression, the trace of the stress tensor is linearly related to the volumetric elastic strain εel,vol (the trace of the elastic strain tensor) by the bulk modulus
here, the pressure p is positive in compression, but the elastic volumetric strain εel,vol is positive in tension.
As opposed to a Linear Elastic Material, the modified Cam-Clay soil model introduces a nonlinear relation for the hydrostatic pressure as a function of the volumetric elastic strain:
with
here, the reference pressure pref is the pressure at which the reference void ratio eref was measured, and κ is the swelling index.
The initial bulk modulus is then given by the expression K0 = Belpref, and the tangent bulk modulus by the expression Kt = Belpmcc. See also the section Tangent and secant moduli.
In order to have zero stress at zero volumetric strain, the reference pressure is removed from the stress tensor, so the total pressure finally reads
The stress tensor is then computed from
Hardening and softening
The yield surface for the modified Cam-Clay model reads
The yield surface and the associated flow rule (Qp = Fy) give the rate equation for the plastic strains. The plastic strain tensor εp is calculated from the plastic multiplier λp and the derivatives of the plastic potential Qp with respect to the stress tensor σ
Here, λp stands for the plastic multiplier, see Plastic Flow for Small Strains and Isotropic Hardening.
The plastic strain rate tensor includes both deviatoric and isotropic parts. Note that
and
These relations can be used for writing the plastic flow as
since the associated flow rule implies a plastic potential such as
the plastic flow rule simplifies to
The trace of the plastic strain rate tensor (the volumetric plastic strain rate ) then reads
This relation explains the reason why there is isotropic hardening when the pressure is p > pc/2 and isotropic softening when p < pc/2. As opposed to what happens in J2 plasticity, in the modified Cam-Clay soil model the volumetric plastic strain can either increase or decrease as plastic deformation occurs.
In the modified Cam-Clay model, hardening is controlled by the consolidation pressure pc as a function of volumetric plastic strain, as described in Equation 3-40.
Hardening introduces changes in the shape of the Cam-Clay ellipse, since its major semi-axis depends on the value of the consolidation pressure pc. The initial consolidation pressure pc0 defines the size of the ellipse before plastic deformation occurs.
Including pore pressure
When an external pore pressure pf is added to the modified Cam-Clay material, the yield function is shifted on the p axis, and the yield function reads:
The quantity p − pf is normally regarded as the effective pressure, or effective stress, which should not be confused with von Mises stress. To add the effect of a fluid pressure in the pores pf to the Modified Cam-Clay material, add an External Stress feature.
See also the description of the Elastoplastic Soil Material materials in the Solid Mechanics interface documentation.
The Modified Structured Cam-Clay Soil Model
The structured Cam-Clay model (SCC) was developed (Ref. 20, Ref. 21) to circumvent the limitations of the Cam-Clay model when applied to structured soils and clays. The SCC model, however, does not considered the influence of the soil structure neither on strength characteristics (especially cohesion) nor in the softening behavior, and it is also not suitable to model cemented clays.
The modified structured Cam-Clay model (MSCC) was further developed to model destructured, naturally structured and artificially structured clays (Ref. 20), and it is the one implemented in the Geomechanics Module.
In the MSCC model, the reduction of mean effective stress due to structure degradation, pb, depends on the shear plastic strain εp,dev. The destructuring mechanism is the process of reducing structure strength due to the degradation and crushing of the structure. The structure degradation is given by
(3-41)
here, pbi is the initial structural strength, pbf the failure structural strength, εp,devc is the effective plastic strain at failure, and ds is the destructuring index due to shear deformation.
The effective deviatoric plastic strain at which the crushing of the structure begins, εp,devc, has a typical value between 0.15 and 0.3 for most clays.
Structured clays show a higher void ratio than destructured clays at the same effective mean stress. The virgin compression behavior during the destructuring process is expressed by
where is e void ratio of the structured clay, e* is void ratio of the destructured clay at the same stress state, Δei is the additional void ratio at consolidation pressure, and dv is the destructuring index due to volumetric deformation.
The yield surface for the modified structured Cam-Clay model reads
The nonassociated plastic potential reads
here, ς is a parameter to smooth the shape of the plastic potential.
As opposed to The Modified Cam-Clay Soil Model, the slope of the critical state line, M, depends on both the Lode angle θ and the angle of internal friction
where
In the modified structured Cam-Clay soil model, hardening is controlled by the consolidation pressure pc as a function of volumetric plastic strain, as described in Equation 3-40 and the contribution to the mean stress due to the structure, pb, as written in Equation 3-41.
The MSCC and MCC models are equivalent when Δei = 0, ς = 2, and pb = 0.
The relationship between hydrostatic pressure and volumetric elastic strain is the same as the one outlined in The Modified Cam-Clay Soil Model
with
In order to have zero stress at zero volumetric strain, the reference pressure is removed from the stress tensor, so the total pressure finally reads
The stress tensor is then computed from
The Extended Barcelona Basic Soil Model
The Barcelona Basic model (BBM) was developed to simulate unsaturated and partially saturated soils, by incorporating an extra state variable for the pore suction. Suction affects the flow in porous soils, as well as the stress distribution and deformation.
The suction value depends on the amount of water in the soil. The BBM uses the concepts of plasticity theory, incorporating the critical state model (Ref. 22). This soil model matches the results obtained with the Modified Cam-Clay Model in fully saturated soils.
The so-called extended Barcelona Basic model (BBMx) was further developed to overcome the numerical limitations of the original BBM model (Ref. 23). The BBMx model presents a smooth yield surface with respect to both stress and suction, and it is the one implemented in the Geomechanics Module.
The yield surface for the extended Barcelona Basic Model reads
here, pcs is the consolidation pressure at current suction, b is a dimensionless smoothing parameter, and sy is the yield value at current suction. The tensile strength due to current suction, ps, is linearly related to the suction level as ps = ks, where k is the tension to suction ratio.
The associated plastic potential for the BBMx model reads
but the plastic strain increments are computed from the derivatives of the plastic potential with respect to stress only.
As described in the modified Cam-Clay model, hardening is controlled by the consolidation pressure pc, which depends on the volumetric plastic strain εp,vol as
(3-42)
The evolution of the consolidation pressure depends on the values for the reference void ratio eref, the swelling index κ, and the compression index λ, which are positive parameters.
The evolution of the yield value at current suction sy is also governed by the volumetric plastic strain εpl,vol as
(3-43)
where λs is the compression index at current suction and patm is the atmospheric pressure. Note that Equation 3-42 and Equation 3-43 are normally given with opposite sign, but here we use Structural Mechanics convention so the increments in consolidation pressure and suction are positive in compression.
The consolidation pressure at current suction pcs is given by
where λ0 is the compression index at saturation and the compression index at current suction, λs, is given by
where w and m are weighting and soil stiffness parameters.
In the BBMx model, the suction s is linearly related to the volumetric elastic strain εel,vol and the pressure
here K is the bulk modulus, Kc the stiffness to suction, and s0 is the initial value of suction. The pressure p is positive in compression, but the elastic volumetric strain εel,vol is positive in tension.
The relationship between hydrostatic pressure and volumetric elastic strain is the same as given in the The Modified Cam-Clay Soil Model
with .
In order to have zero stress at zero volumetric strain, the reference pressure is removed from the mean stress, so the total pressure finally reads
The stress tensor is then computed from
The Hardening Soil Model
The Hardening Soil model is a nonlinear elastic material model with stress dependent and stress path dependent stiffness approach. It is a so-called double stiffness model, which has different stiffness during primary loading and unloading/reloading cases (Ref. 24). The yield surface for th Hardening Soil model is combination of a conical surface and a elliptic cap surface in stress space. The failure in shear occurs according to Mohr-Coulomb criterion.
The stiffness modulus for primary loading, denoted by E50, and for unloading/reloading, denoted by Eur, are given by the expressions
here and are reference stiffness moduli at reference pressure pref, c is the cohesion, phi is the angle of internal friction, and m is the stress exponent. From the Mohr-Coulomb criterion, the ultimate deviatoric stress, qf, and the stress to failure qa are defined as
and
where Rf is failure ratio.
The yield function and plastic potential for the shear hardening cone are written in terms of stress invariants as
here, γp is the accumulated plastic shear strain, and ψm is the mobilized dilatancy angle.
The yield function, and associated plastic potential, for the elliptic cap is written in terms of stress invariants as
here, Rc is ellipse aspect ratio.
The evolution of the internal variables pc and γp are governed by the volumetric plastic strain εpl,vol and the plastic strain invariant J2 pl) as
here, H is the hardening modulus, which is derived from the bulk modulus in compression (for primary loading) Kc, and the bulk modulus in swelling (for unloading and reloading) Ks.
where
The dilatancy cut-off is implemented by setting the mobilized dilatancy angle ψm equal to zero when the void ratio reaches the critical void ratio emax.
For additive decomposition of strains, Cauchy’s stress tensor is written as
where C is a function of the stiffness modulus Eur and Poisson’s ratio ν.