Elastoplastic Soils
In this section:
The Modified Cam-Clay Soil Model
The Cam-clay material model was developed in the 1970s at the University of Cambridge, and since then it has experienced many modifications. The modified Cam-clay (MCC) model is the most commonly used model due to its smooth yield surface, and it is the one implemented in COMSOL Multiphysics.
The modified Cam-clay model is a so-called critical state model, where the loading and unloading of the material follow different paths in stress space. The model also features hardening and softening. Different formulations can be found in textbooks, see for instance Ref. 68, Ref. 69, and Ref. 70.
The yield function was originally written in terms of the Invariants of the Stress Tensor
Following the Structural Mechanics Module sign convention (the pressure is positive in compression), the yield function reads:
This is an ellipse in the Meridional Plane, with a circular section in the Octahedral Plane.
If we write the Cam-clay yield function in terms of the invariants described in Pressure-Dependent and Soil Plasticity:
we get
Here, σm is the mean stress, σmises is the von Mises equivalent stress, θ is the Lode angle, and Γ(θ) is a function of θ that defines the shape of the yield function in the Octahedral Plane.
The shape of the yield function in the Octahedral Plane, Γ(θ), can be made a function of the Lode angle θ by using any of the functions described in Octahedral Section. The most common choice, Γ(θ) = 1, results in a circular section that recovers the original Cam-clay model.
The parameter pc > 0 is the consolidation pressure, and the parameter M > 0 defines the slope of the critical state line in the Meridional Plane which also represents the eccentricity of the ellipse. This parameter can be matched to the friction angle ϕ in the Mohr–Coulomb Criterion criterion as
(3-130)
Figure 3-29: Modified Cam-clay ellipse in the meridional plane. The ellipse circumscribes a nonlinear elastic region.
The Cam-clay criterion can be used with either an associated or nonassociated flow rule. For the nonassociated flow rule, the plastic potential is defined as
The parameter MQ represents the slope of the critical state line for the plastic potential, which a can be matched to the Mohr–Coulomb Criterion criterion at the compressive meridian by the dilatation angle ψ
The soil response to isotropic compression is described by the curve of the void ratio (or specific volume or volumetric strain) versus the logarithm of pressure as shown in Figure 3-30.
The void ratio e is the ratio between the pore space and solid volume. It can be written in terms of the porosity ϕ as e = ϕ/(1 − ϕ).
Figure 3-30: Slopes of the virgin isotropic consolidation line and swelling line in the e versus plane.
The compression index λ corresponds to the slope of the virgin isotropic consolidation line, and the swelling index κ corresponds to the slope of the swelling line (also called unloading-reloading line) in the e versus ln(p) plane. The reference void ratio eref is measured at the reference pressure pref and the initial void ratio e0 is measured at the initial mean stress p0. The starting value of the initial mean stress p0 is the reference pressure pref. The equation for the virgin isotropic consolidation line reads
The void ratio at the preconsolidation pressure pc0 is given by
The equation for the swelling line is
where e0 is the initial void ratio calculated as
The initial void ratio e0 can be directly entered as user input. In this case, the void ratio at the initial consolidation pressure, ec0, is not needed as intermediate variable.
Assuming small deformations and adopting the sign convention of Structural Mechanics, the volumetric strain is related to the void ratio as
For elastic response, the incremental volumetric elastic strain is written as
(3-131)
Integrating Equation 3-131, the equation is reformulated as
Then the nonlinear relation between pressure and volumetric strain is obtained by
(3-132)
where
The contribution to initial mean stress p0 also comes from the mean stress in the initial or external stress tensor. The reference pressure is generally a unit pressure in the used unit system, in the literature the value varies from 1 kPa to 100 kPa. In COMSOL Multiphysics the default value is 100 kPa.
At zero volumetric elastic strain and with zero contribution from the Initial Stress and Strain or External Stress features, the initial mean stress is nonzero and equal to the reference pressure pref. The reference pressure acts as an in situ stress.
(3-133)
The tangent bulk modulus Kt is written as
The secant bulk modulus Ks (or bulk modulus K) is written as
The total volumetric strain increment in written as
The evolution of the void ratio is then written as
(3-134) or
(3-135)
Equation 3-134 is used to compute the void ratio, which matches the analytical expression in Equation 3-135. These two equations can be used for verification purposes.
In the modified Cam-clay model, hardening is controlled by the consolidation pressure pc, which depends on the volumetric plastic strain εp,vol as
(3-136)
The elastic and plastic volumetric strains are available in the variable solid.eelvol and solid.epvol, respectively. The consolidation pressure is available in the variable item.pc.
The evolution of the consolidation pressure depends on the values for the initial void ratio e0, the swelling index κ, and the compression index λ, which are positive parameters that fulfill
and
If an Initial Stress and Strain or External Stress node is added, the initial consolidation pressure pc0 must be larger than the mean initial (or external) stress, otherwise the initial stress state will be outside the Cam-clay yield surface.
Volumetric Elastic Deformation
The stress–strain relation beyond the elastic range is of great importance in soil mechanics. For additive decomposition of strains, Cauchy stress tensor is written as
with
Here, σ is the stress tensor, ε is the total strain tensor, εel is the elastic strain tensor, and G is the shear modulus.
At zero volumetric strain, and with zero contribution from Initial Stress and Strain or External Stress features, the pressure in the MCC model is equal to the reference pressure pref (see Equation 3-132 and Equation 3-133). This is needed since the MCC model does not have stiffness at zero stress. The reference pressure appears as an additional term in the variational formulation (weak equation).
The modified Cam-clay model introduces a nonlinear relation for the hydrostatic pressure as a function of the volumetric elastic strain given by Equation 3-132.
Hardening and Softening
The yield surface for the original Cam-clay model reads
The plastic strain tensor εp is computed from the flow rule
where λp is the plastic multiplier and the derivatives of the plastic potential Qp with respect to the stress tensor σ. An associated flow rule is used such that Qp = Fy.
The plastic flow rule simplifies to
where the plastic strain rate tensor includes both deviatoric and volumetric parts. The trace of the plastic strain rate tensor (the volumetric plastic strain rate ) then reads
This relation explains why there is isotropic hardening when the pressure is p > pc/2 and isotropic softening when p < pc/2. As opposed to what happens in Metal Plasticity, in the modified Cam-clay soil model the volumetric plastic strain can either increase or decrease as plastic deformation occurs.
In the MCC model, hardening is controlled by changes in the consolidation pressure pc as a function of volumetric plastic strain.
Hardening introduces changes in the shape of the Cam-clay ellipse, since its major semiaxis depends on the value of the consolidation pressure pc. The initial consolidation pressure pc0 defines the size of the ellipse before plastic deformation occurs.
See also Additive Plastic Flow and Numerical Integration Algorithm. If a multiplicative decomposition of strains is used, the flow rule is reformulated according to Multiplicative Plastic Flow.
Including Pore Pressure
When an external pore pressure pf is added to the MCC material, the yield function is shifted along the p axis.
The quantity p − pf is normally regarded as the effective pressure, or effective stress, which should not be confused with the equivalent von Mises stress. To add the effect of a fluid pressure in the pores to the modified Cam-clay material, add an External Stress feature.
See also the description of the Elastoplastic Soil Material materials in the Solid Mechanics interface documentation.
The Modified Structured Cam-Clay Soil Model
The structured Cam-clay (SCC) model (Ref. 76) was developed to circumvent the limitations of the Cam-clay model when applied to structured soils and clays. The SCC model, however, does not consider the influence of the soil structure neither on strength characteristics (especially cohesion) nor in the softening behavior, and it is also not suitable to model cemented clays.
The modified structured Cam-clay (MSCC) model was further developed to model destructured, naturally structured and artificially structured clays (Ref. 75), and it is the one implemented in COMSOL Multiphysics.
In the MSCC model, the reduction of mean effective stress due to structure degradation, pb, depends on the equivalent plastic strain εpe. The destructuring mechanism is the process of reducing structure strength due to the degradation and crushing of the structure. The structure degradation is given by
(3-137)
Here, pb0 is the initial structural strength, pbf the failure structural strength, εfp,dev is the plastic deviatoric strain at failure, and ds is the destructuring index due to shear deformation.
The equivalent deviatoric plastic strain at which the crushing of the structure begins, εp,devc, has a typical value between 0.15 and 0.3 for most clays.
Structured clays show a higher void ratio than destructured clays when loaded at the same effective stress. The virgin compression behavior during the destructuring process is expressed by
where is e is the void ratio of the structured clay, Δe is the additional void ratio, and e* is the void ratio of the destructured clay at the same stress state. The void ratio is computed by using Equation 3-135. Further, Δec0 is the additional void ratio at preconsolidation pressure, and dv is the destructuring index due to volumetric deformation.
The yield surface for the modified structured Cam-clay model reads
Here, θ is the Lode angle, and Γ(θ) is a function of θ that defines the shape of the yield function in the Octahedral Plane.
The shape of the yield function in the Octahedral Plane, Γ(θ), can be made a function of the Lode angle θ by using any of the functions described in Octahedral Section. The most common choice, Γ(θ) = 1, results in a circular section that recovers the original criterion.
The modified structured Cam-clay criterion can be used with either an associated or nonassociated flow rule. For the nonassociated flow rule, the McDowell–Hau plastic potential is defined as
The parameter MQ represents the slope of the critical state line for the plastic potential, which a can be matched to the Mohr–Coulomb Criterion criterion at the compressive meridian by the dilatation angle ψ
Here, ς is a parameter to smooth the shape of the plastic potential. The slope of the critical state line, MQ, is found by using Equation 3-130.
In the modified structured Cam-clay soil model, hardening is controlled by the consolidation pressure pc as a function of volumetric plastic strain, and it is described as
Here, λ* is the compression index for destructured clay, κ is the swelling index, and η is ratio of shear stress to mean stress.
The MSCC and MCC models are equivalent when Δec0 = 0, ς = 2, and pb0 = 0.
The relationship between hydrostatic pressure and volumetric elastic strain is outlined in The Modified Cam-Clay Soil Model,
(3-138) with
The stress tensor is then computed from
At zero volumetric strain, and with zero contribution from the Initial Stress and Strain or External Stress features, the pressure in the MSCC model is equal to the reference pressure pref (see Equation 3-138 and Equation 3-133). This is needed since the MSCC model does not have stiffness at zero stress. The reference pressure appears as an additional term in the variational formulation (weak equation).
The Extended Barcelona Basic Soil Model
The Barcelona basic model (BBM) was developed to simulate the loading of unsaturated and partially saturated soils, by incorporating an extra state variable for the pore suction. The suction value depends on the amount of water in the soil, and it affects the flow in porous soils as well as the deformation and stress distribution.
The BBM model uses the concepts of plasticity theory, incorporating the critical state model (Ref. 77). This soil model matches the results obtained with the modified Cam-clay model in fully saturated soils.
The so-called extended Barcelona basic model (BBMx) was further developed to overcome numerical limitations in the original BBM model (Ref. 78). The model implemented in COMSOL Multiphysics follows Ref. 78 with certain modifications described in this section.
The BBMx model presents a smooth yield surface with respect to both stress and suction
Here, p and q are stress invariants as defined in The Modified Cam-Clay Soil Model, pcs is the consolidation pressure at current suction, ps is the tensile strength due to current suction, s is the current suction, b is a dimensionless smoothing parameter, sy is the yield value at current suction, and pref is the reference pressure at which the reference void ratio eref was measured.
The shape of the yield function in the Octahedral Plane, Γ(θ), can be made a function of the Lode angle θ by using any of the functions described in Octahedral Section. The most common choice, Γ(θ) = 1, results in a circular section that recovers the original criterion.
The tensile strength due to current suction, ps, is linearly related to the suction level as ps = ks, where k is the tension to suction ratio.
The BBMx criterion can be used with either an associated or nonassociated flow rule. For the nonassociated flow rule, the plastic potential is defined as
The parameter MQ represents the slope of the critical state line for the plastic potential, which a can be matched to the Mohr–Coulomb Criterion criterion at the compressive meridian by using the dilatation angle ψ
Here, ς is a parameter to smooth the shape of the plastic potential. The slope of the critical state line, MQ, is found by using Equation 3-130.
The consolidation pressure at current suction pcs is calculated from
where λ(s) is the compression index at current suction, λ0 is the compression index at saturation, and κ is the swelling index. The compression index at current suction, λ(s), is given by
where w and m are weighting and soil stiffness parameters.
The slope of the critical state line M can be computed from the Matsuoka–Nakai criterion, in which case it depends on both the Lode angle θ and the angle of internal friction ϕ
(3-139)
where
At the tensile or compressive meridians, where the Lode angle is θ = 0 or θ = π/3, the slope of the critical state line achieves the same expression as when matched to the Mohr–Coulomb Criterion, see Equation 3-130
It can also be matched to the Matsuoka–Nakai Criterion.
The associated plastic potential for the BBMx model reads
The plastic strain increments are computed from the derivatives of the plastic potential with respect to stress only.
As in The Modified Cam-Clay Soil Model, hardening is controlled by the evolution of the consolidation pressure pc, which depends on the volumetric plastic strain εp,vol.
(3-140)
The initial void ratio e0, the swelling index κ, and the compression index at saturation λ0, are positive parameters.
The evolution of the yield value at current suction, sy, is also governed by the volumetric plastic strain εpl,vol as
(3-141)
Here, λs is the compression index for changes in suction, κs is the swelling index for changes in suction, and patm is the atmospheric pressure, all positive parameters. Note that Equation 3-140 and Equation 3-141 are normally given with opposite sign. Here, however, the structural mechanics convention is used, so the increments in consolidation pressure and suction are positive in compression.
The evolution of void ratio is then written as
or
where
In the BBMx model, the total volumetric elastic response is combination of elastic response by pressure and suction,
where
Here K is the bulk modulus, and Kcs the stiffness to suction. Note that the pressure p in compression and suction s is positive variables, but the elastic volumetric strain εel,vol is negative in compression. The volumetric elastic response due to suction is given by
Here, s0 is the initial suction. The volumetric elastic response due to suction is accounted as an inelastic strains in the total strain tensor, any changes in suction while keeping a constant pressure can cause volumetric strains.
The relationship between hydrostatic pressure and volumetric elastic strain is the same as outlined for The Modified Cam-Clay Soil Model
(3-142) with
The stress tensor is then computed from
At zero volumetric strain, and with zero contribution from the Initial Stress and Strain or External Stress feature, the pressure in the BBMx model is equal to the reference pressure (see Equation 3-142 and Equation 3-133). This is needed since the BBMx model does not have stiffness at zero stress. The reference pressure appears as an additional term in the variational formulation (weak equation form).
The material property λ0 is the compression index at saturation, which does not depend on suction.
The variable λ(s), which is a function of the current suction, corresponds to the compression index (slope) in the void ratio versus mean stress plot (log axis).
The material property λs corresponds to the compression index (slope) in the void ratio versus matrix suction plot (log axis), which does not depend on the mean stress.
The Hardening Soil Model
The hardening soil model is an elastoplastic material model with a stress and stress path-dependent stiffness. It is a so-called double stiffness model, meaning that the soil stiffness is different during primary loading and unloading/reloading load paths (Ref. 79).
The yield surface for the hardening soil model is a combination of a conical surface and an elliptic cap surface in stress space, and it has separate mechanisms for controlling the soil’s shear and volumetric behavior.
In the original hardening soil model, failure in shear occurs according to the Mohr–Coulomb Criterion. In the so-called hardening soil smooth model (Ref. 79), failure in shear occurs according to Matsuoka–Nakai Criterion.
In Ref. 81, the shear hardening and failure surfaces are combined, and the failure surface imposes the final limit on shear stresses. COMSOL Multiphysics implements the latter version.
The 50% failure stiffness for primary loading, E50, and the stiffness for unloading and reloading, Eur, are used to define the elastic relation and hardening variable. These are given by
and
Here is the reference failure stiffness for primary loading at reference pressure, is the reference stiffness for unloading and reloading at reference pressure, c is the cohesion, ϕ is the friction angle, and m is the stress exponent.
The ultimate deviatoric stress qf and the stress to failure qa are derived from the Mohr–Coulomb Criterion
and
where Rf is the failure ratio.
Consider the stress invariants and , the yield function and plastic potential for shear hardening are given by
Here, θ is the Lode angle, and Γ(θ) is a function of θ that defines the shape of the yield function in the Octahedral Plane, and ψm is the mobilized dilatancy angle.
The shape of the yield function in the Octahedral Plane, Γ(θ), can be made a function of the Lode angle θ by using any of the functions described in Octahedral Section. The most common choice, Γ(θ) = 1, results in a circular section.
The yield function for the elliptic cap is described in the Compression Cap section.
For linear hardening, the internal variable for the preconsolidation pressure, pc, depends on the volumetric plastic strain εpl,vol as
where Kc is the hardening modulus and
The dilatancy cutoff is implemented by setting the mobilized dilatancy angle ψm equal to zero when the void ratio reaches the critical void ratio emax.
Cauchy’s stress tensor is then written as
where C is a function of the stiffness modulus Eur and Poisson’s ratio ν.
If required, add a Compression Cap or a Tension Cutoff criterion to the hardening soil model.
Mobilized Dilatancy Angle
The mobilized dilatancy angle ψm is explicitly used in the definition for the plastic potential Qp. Different authors define this variable using different expressions. The original expression for the mobilized dilatancy derived by Rowe (Ref. 79) is
(3-143)
here, ϕc is the critical friction angle and ϕm is the mobilized friction angle, and these are derived from
where ψ is the dilatancy angle, σi are the principal stresses, c is the cohesion, and ϕ is the angle of internal friction.
Rowe’s original model for the mobilized dilatancy angle is highly contractive at low angles, so the modified Rowe’s model reads
(3-144)
which however, does not fully account for the plastic volumetric contraction either.
Other expressions (Ref. 79) for the mobilized dilatancy angle include the Wehnert correction
(3-145)
the Soreide correction
(3-146)
The Hardening Soil Small Strain Model
The hardening soil small strain model is a combination of Small-Strain Overlay model and The Hardening Soil Model.
The small strain shear modulus is computed from other material parameters, as done in the hardening soil model
Here is the reference small strain shear modulus for primary loading at reference pressure, c is the cohesion, ϕ is the friction angle, and m is the stress exponent.
The critical shear strain, defined as
is used to switch between the shear stiffness derived from the small-strain overlay and the hardening soil models:
Here, Gur is the shear modulus for unloading/reloading, as defined in The Hardening Soil Model.
The yield function for the elliptic cap is described in the Compression Cap section. If required, add a Tension Cutoff criterion to the hardening soil small strain model.