(7-1)
Here, σ is the Cauchy stress tensor,
ε is the strain tensor,
αB is the
Biot–Willis coefficient, and
pf is the fluid pore pressure. For linear elasticity, the coefficients in the elasticity matrix
C must be measured under “drained” conditions by measuring the strain induced by a change in stress (or by measuring the induced stress by changes in strain) under constant pore pressure.
where Gd is the shear modulus of the drained porous matrix.
Here, the mean pressure pm is positive in compression,
Kd is the bulk modulus of the drained porous matrix, and the volumetric strain
εvol is a measurement of the porous matrix dilation or contraction (negative in compression).
Note that the Poroelasticity multiphysics coupling adds the contribution from the pore pressure,
αBpf, as a load. In this setting, the variables for the stress tensor
σ and mean pressure
pm are
effective stress measures.
The other constitutive relation in Biot’s theory of poroelasticity (Ref. 1) relates the increment in fluid content
ζ to changes in volumetric strain and pore pressure. The pore pressure is proportional to the dilation of the porous matrix and the variation in fluid content:
(7-2)
Biot and Willis (Ref. 1) measured the coefficients
αB and
M with the unjacketed compressibility test and derived expressions for these coefficients in terms of solid and fluid bulk moduli (or compressibilities).
The variable M, sometimes called the Biot modulus, is the inverse of the storage coefficient
Sp in the Darcy’s law interface. It is defined through
Equation 7-2 as the change in fluid content due to changes in pore pressure under constant deformation (constant volumetric strain):
Using this definition, it is possible to measure the storage coefficient Sp directly in the lab, and, in the case of an ideal isotropic porous material, it can be calculated from basic material properties as
(7-3)
where εp is the initial porosity,
Kf the fluid bulk modulus (the inverse of the fluid compressibility
χf), and
Ks the solid bulk modulus (the inverse of the solid compressibility
χs); that is, the theoretical bulk modulus of a homogeneous block of the solid material making up the porous matrix.
The Biot–Willis coefficient, αB, relates the volume of fluid expelled (or sucked into) a porous material element due to the volumetric change of the same element. This coefficient can be measured experimentally as the change in mean pressure due to changes in the pore pressure under constant deformation (constant volumetric strain). In the case of an ideal isotropic porous material it can be defined in terms of the drained and solid bulk moduli as
The drained bulk modulus Kd is always smaller than the solid bulk modulus
Ks (a solid block is stiffer than a porous block made of the same material), and therefore the Biot–Willis coefficient is bounded to
εp ≤ αB ≤ 1.
By replacing Ks = Kd/(1 − αB), the storage coefficient
Sp in
Equation 7-3 is calculated in terms of the porosity
εp, the Biot–Willis coefficient
αB, and the bulk moduli of the fluid
Kf and the drained porous matrix
Kd as
(7-4)
For a soft porous matrix, αB ≈ 1, or for a stiff porous matrix,
αB ≈ εp, the lower bound for the poroelastic storage is
Sp ≈ εp/Kf.
A special case of Biot’s theory of poroelasticity arises if both the solid and the fluid phases are assumed incompressible. In this case, it follows that χf = χs = 0, the Biot–Willis coefficient
αB = 1, and the storage coefficient
Sp = 0. The corresponding governing equations are then identical to those derived for a biphasic porous medium with incompressible solid and fluid constituents (
Ref. 3). This version of the poroelasticity coupling is available by selecting the
Biphasic poroelasticity model, see
Poroelastic Coupling Properties.
(7-5)
where σ is the stress tensor computed from linear elasticity, and
g is the gravitational acceleration. The average density
ρav is computed from
where ρf represents the fluid density,
ρd =
(
1 − εp)
ρs the density of the dry porous matrix, and
ρs the density of the solid material.
Equation 7-5, which describes an equilibrium state (inertial effects are neglected), also applies to the case of a time-dependent flow model. This is a valid assumption in geotechnical and biological applications since the time scale of the inertial response is generally many orders of magnitude faster than the time scale of the flow. When you study the coupled process on the time scale of the flow, you can therefore assume that the solid reaches a new equilibrium immediately in response to a change in the flow conditions. This means that the stresses and strains change in time — even if
Equation 7-5 appears to be stationary — and that the structure-to-fluid coupling term, involving the rate of strain, is nonzero.
When Include inertial terms is selected, the average density is used in the inertial term for the momentum equation. In the presence of a volume force
f (for example, gravity), the momentum balance then reads
(7-6)
where u represents the solid displacement and
ρav the average density.