Temperature Contribution to the Inflow Boundary Condition
As shown in Equation 3-1, the enthalpy variation depends in general both on the difference in temperature and in pressure. However, the pressure contribution to the enthalpy, ΔHp, can be neglected when the work due to pressure changes is not included in the energy equation. This is controlled by the Nonisothermal Flow multiphysics coupling depending on compressibility assumption.
There is another classical case where this term cancels out: when the fluid is modeled as an ideal gas. Indeed, in this case,
When the pressure contribution to the enthalpy is neglected, the boundary condition reads:
(3-4)
When advective heat transfer dominates at the inlet (large flow rates), the temperature gradient, and hence the heat transfer by conduction, in the normal direction to the inlet boundary is very small. So in this case, Equation 3-4 imposes that the enthalpy variation is close to zero. As Cp is positive, the Inflow boundary condition requires T=Tustr to be fulfilled. So, when advective heat transfer dominates at the inlet, the Inflow boundary condition is almost equivalent to a Dirichlet boundary condition that prescribes the upstream temperature at the inlet.
Conversely, when the flow rate is low or in the presence of large heat sources or sinks next to the inlet, the conductive heat flux cannot be neglected. In addition, the inlet temperature has to be adjusted to balance the energy brought by the flow at the inlet and the energy transferred by conduction from the interior, as described by Equation 3-4. This makes it possible to observe a realistic upstream feedback due to thermal conduction from the inlet surroundings.